When comparing TrueNAS Core to Windows for file sharing, several factors come into play, including performance, features, ease of use, and specific use cases. Here’s a detailed look at the advantages and disadvantages of each option:

Advantages of TrueNAS Core

1. Optimized for Storage: TrueNAS is specifically designed for storage management, offering advanced features like ZFS file system support, which provides data integrity, snapshots, and efficient data compression
   1
   3
   .
2. Better Performance with Large Data Sets: TrueNAS can handle large volumes of data more efficiently than Windows due to its optimized file system and caching mechanisms. It is particularly beneficial for setups requiring RAID configurations and redundancy
   1
   3
   .
3. User Management and Permissions: TrueNAS offers robust user management capabilities, including integration with Active Directory (AD) for enterprise environments. This can simplify permissions management compared to Windows
   3
   .
4. Web-Based Interface: While it lacks a traditional desktop GUI, TrueNAS provides a web-based interface that can be more powerful and flexible for managing storage settings and shares across various platforms
   1
   3
   .
5. Cost-Effective for Dedicated Storage: If you need a dedicated NAS solution without the overhead of a full operating system like Windows, TrueNAS can be more cost-effective in terms of resource usage.

Advantages of Using Windows

1. Ease of Use: For users familiar with Windows, setting up file sharing is straightforward with a graphical interface. This can be less intimidating for those who are not comfortable with command-line interfaces or web-based management
   1
   4
   .
2. Multi-Purpose Functionality: A Windows machine can serve multiple purposes beyond file sharing, such as running applications like Office or Photoshop, which might be necessary for some users
   1
   .
3. Compatibility with Existing Infrastructure: If your environment already relies on Windows-based systems, it may be easier to maintain compatibility without introducing a new operating system like TrueNAS.
4. Familiar File Sharing Protocols: Windows supports SMB/CIFS natively, which is widely used across different platforms (Windows, Linux, macOS). However, there can be compatibility issues with macOS clients depending on the version of SMB used
   5
   .
5. Backup and Recovery Options: Windows provides built-in tools for backup and recovery that can be easier to manage for users already accustomed to the OS
   4
   .

Considerations

• Use Case: If your primary need is simple file sharing without complex requirements (like RAID or extensive user management), sticking with Windows might be sufficient. However, if you require robust data protection features and plan to manage large datasets or run services like Plex efficiently, TrueNAS could be the better choice
  1
  3
  .
• Technical Expertise: Transitioning to TrueNAS may involve a learning curve due to its reliance on web-based management and command-line tools. Users comfortable with Linux or Unix-like systems may find it easier to adapt
  1
  3
  .
• Power Management: If power outages are a concern (as mentioned in some discussions), using a UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) can help protect both Windows and TrueNAS setups from data corruption during unexpected shutdowns
  1
  .

In conclusion, whether TrueNAS Core is better than using Windows for file sharing largely depends on your specific needs and technical comfort level. For dedicated storage solutions requiring advanced features and performance, TrueNAS is often preferred. For general use with ease of access and multi-purpose func